R. Joshua of Sikhnin said in the name of R. Levi, “There are four things that the evil drive would refute [as irrational], and for each of them is written [the word,] huqqah (i.e., an unquestioned statute).84Although Huqqah is normally translated simply as “statute,” the word more fully denotes a command that demands implicit and unquestioned obedience. Huqqah is therefore translated “unquestioned statute” throughout this section. Now these concern the following: (1) the nakedness of a brother's wife, (2) diverse kinds, (3) the scapegoat, and (4) the red heifer.”85PR 14:12; Numb. R. 19:5; see Yoma 67b. In regard to the nakedness of a brother's wife, it is written (in Lev. 18:16), “You shall not uncover the nakedness of your brother's wife”; [yet if the brother] dies without children [it is written] (in Deut. 25:5), “her brother-in-law shall have sexual intercourse with her [and take her for a wife].” And it is written about the sexual prohibitions (in Lev. 18:5), “And you shall keep [all] My unquestioned statutes [...].” In regard to diverse kinds, it is written (in Deut. 22:11), “You shall not wear interwoven stuff, [wool and flax together]”; yet a linen cloak86Gk.: sindon. with [wool] tassels is permitted.87See Numb. 15:37-38. And for [this commandment also] it is written, [that it is] an unquestioned statute. [Thus it is written (in Lev. 19:19),] “You shall keep My unquestioned statute. You shall not mate your cattle with a different kind…, [nor shall you wear a garment with diverse kinds of interwoven stuff].” In regard to the scapegoat, it is written (in Lev. 16:26), “And the one who sets the azazel-goat free shall wash his clothes”; yet it is [the goat] itself that atones for others. And for [this commandment also] it is written (in Lev. 16:34), “And this shall be to you an unquestioned statute forever.” In regard to the red heifer, where is it shown? Since we are taught (in Parah 4:4), “All engaged with the [rite of the red] heifer from beginning to end render [their] garments unclean”; yet it is [the heifer] itself that purifies [what is] unclean. And for [this commandment also] it is written, [that it is] an unquestioned statute. Thus it is written (in Numb. 19:2), “This is an unquestioned statute of the Torah.”
רַבִּי יְהוֹשֻׁעַ דְּסַכְנִין בְּשֵׁם רַבִּי לֵוִי אָמַר, אַרְבָּעָה דְּבָרִים יֵצֶר הָרַע מֵשִׁיב עֲלֵיהֶם, וּכְתִיב בָּהֶן חֻקָּה. וְאֵלּוּ הֵן, אֵשֶׁת אָח, וְכִלְאַיִם, שָׂעִיר הַמִּשְׁתַּלֵּחַ, וּפָרָה אֲדֻמָּה. אֵשֶׁת אָח, דִּכְתִיב: עֶרְוַת אֵשֶׁת אָחִיךָ וְגוֹ' (ויקרא יא, טז). מֵת בְּלֹא בָּנִים, יְבָמָה יָבֹא עָלֶיהָ (דברים כה, ה). וּכְתִיב בָּעֲרָיוֹת, וּשְׁמַרְתֶּם אֶת חֻקּוֹתַי וְאֶת מִשְׁפָּטַי (ויקרא יח, ה). וְכִלְאַיִם, דִּכְתִיב: לֹא תִּלְבַּשׁ שַׁעַטְנֵז (דברים כב, יא). סָדִין בַּצִּיצִית, מֻתָּר. וּכְתִיב בָּהּ חֻקָּה, אֶת חֻקֹּתַי תִּשְׁמֹרוּ בְּהֶמְתְּךָ לֹא תַּרְבִּיעַ כִּלְאַיִם וְגוֹ' (ויקרא יט, יט). שָׂעִיר הַמִּשְׁתַּלֵּחַ, דִּכְתִיב: וְהַמְּשַׁלֵּחַ אֶת הַשָּׂעִיר לַעֲזָאזֵל יְכַבֵּס בְּגָדָיו (ויקרא טז, כו), וְהוּא עַצְמוֹ מְכַפֵּר עַל אֲחֵרִים. וּכְתִיב בָּהּ, וְהָיְתָה זֹאת לָכֶם לְחֻקַּת עוֹלָם (שם פסוק לד). פָּרָה אֲדֻמָּה מִנַּיִן. דִּתְנַן, כָּל הָעוֹסְקִין בַּפָּרָה מִתְּחִלָּה וְעַד סוֹף, מְטַמְּאִין בְּגָדִים, וְהִיא גּוּפָהּ מְטַהֶרֶת בְּגָדִים, וּכְתִיב בָּהּ חֻקָּה, זֹאת חֻקַּת הַתּוֹרָה.
R. Joshua of Sikhnin said in the name of R. Levi, “There are four things that the evil drive would refute [as irrational], and for each of them is written [the word,] huqqah (i.e., an unquestioned statute).84Although Huqqah is normally translated simply as “statute,” the word more fully denotes a command that demands implicit and unquestioned obedience. Huqqah is therefore translated “unquestioned statute” throughout this section. Now these concern the following: (1) the nakedness of a brother's wife, (2) diverse kinds, (3) the scapegoat, and (4) the red heifer.”85PR 14:12; Numb. R. 19:5; see Yoma 67b. In regard to the nakedness of a brother's wife, it is written (in Lev. 18:16), “You shall not uncover the nakedness of your brother's wife”; [yet if the brother] dies without children [it is written] (in Deut. 25:5), “her brother-in-law shall have sexual intercourse with her [and take her for a wife].” And it is written about the sexual prohibitions (in Lev. 18:5), “And you shall keep [all] My unquestioned statutes [...].” In regard to diverse kinds, it is written (in Deut. 22:11), “You shall not wear interwoven stuff, [wool and flax together]”; yet a linen cloak86Gk.: sindon. with [wool] tassels is permitted.87See Numb. 15:37-38. And for [this commandment also] it is written, [that it is] an unquestioned statute. [Thus it is written (in Lev. 19:19),] “You shall keep My unquestioned statute. You shall not mate your cattle with a different kind…, [nor shall you wear a garment with diverse kinds of interwoven stuff].” In regard to the scapegoat, it is written (in Lev. 16:26), “And the one who sets the azazel-goat free shall wash his clothes”; yet it is [the goat] itself that atones for others. And for [this commandment also] it is written (in Lev. 16:34), “And this shall be to you an unquestioned statute forever.” In regard to the red heifer, where is it shown? Since we are taught (in Parah 4:4), “All engaged with the [rite of the red] heifer from beginning to end render [their] garments unclean”; yet it is [the heifer] itself that purifies [what is] unclean. And for [this commandment also] it is written, [that it is] an unquestioned statute. Thus it is written (in Numb. 19:2), “This is an unquestioned statute of the Torah.”