[א] "וכפר עליו הכהן…" מה תלמוד לומר? מנין אתה אומר שאם בא לידו ספק חלב ודם ונותר ופגול בהעלם אחד – מנין שחייב על כל אחת ואחת? תלמוד לומר "שגגתו". בא לפניו [ספק חלב ולא ידע, ספק חלב] ולא ידע – מנין שאינו חייב אלא אחת? תלמוד לומר "אשר שגג". בא לפניו ספק חלב וידע, ספק חלב וידע – רבי אומר כשם שמביא חטאת על כל אחת ואחת כך מביא אשם תלוי על כל אחת ואחת.
1) (Vayikra 5:18) ("And he shall bring a ram without blemish, from the flock, by your valuation for a guilt-offering to the Cohein. And the Cohein shall make atonement for his unwitting sin, wherein he sinned unwittingly. For he did not know, and it will be forgiven him.") "And the Cohein shall make atonement, etc.": Whence is it derived that if there came before him a possibility of forbidden fats, and he did not know (that it came before him, or that it might possibly have come before him; and there came before him again) a possibility of forbidden fats and he did not know — and blood, and pigul in one span of forgetfulness — (Whence is it derived) that he is liable for each one? From "his unwitting sin." If it came before him (definitely), and he did not know, whence is it derived that he is liable for only one (guilt-offering)? From "wherein he sinned unwittingly." If there came before him a possibility of forbidden fats and he knew, (and, again,) a possibility of forbidden fats and he knew — Rebbi says: Whence is it derived that just as he brings a sin-offering for each one, so he brings a suspended guilt-offering for each one? From "for his unwitting sin."
[א] "וכפר עליו הכהן…" מה תלמוד לומר? מנין אתה אומר שאם בא לידו ספק חלב ודם ונותר ופגול בהעלם אחד – מנין שחייב על כל אחת ואחת? תלמוד לומר "שגגתו". בא לפניו [ספק חלב ולא ידע, ספק חלב] ולא ידע – מנין שאינו חייב אלא אחת? תלמוד לומר "אשר שגג". בא לפניו ספק חלב וידע, ספק חלב וידע – רבי אומר כשם שמביא חטאת על כל אחת ואחת כך מביא אשם תלוי על כל אחת ואחת.
1) (Vayikra 5:18) ("And he shall bring a ram without blemish, from the flock, by your valuation for a guilt-offering to the Cohein. And the Cohein shall make atonement for his unwitting sin, wherein he sinned unwittingly. For he did not know, and it will be forgiven him.") "And the Cohein shall make atonement, etc.": Whence is it derived that if there came before him a possibility of forbidden fats, and he did not know (that it came before him, or that it might possibly have come before him; and there came before him again) a possibility of forbidden fats and he did not know — and blood, and pigul in one span of forgetfulness — (Whence is it derived) that he is liable for each one? From "his unwitting sin." If it came before him (definitely), and he did not know, whence is it derived that he is liable for only one (guilt-offering)? From "wherein he sinned unwittingly." If there came before him a possibility of forbidden fats and he knew, (and, again,) a possibility of forbidden fats and he knew — Rebbi says: Whence is it derived that just as he brings a sin-offering for each one, so he brings a suspended guilt-offering for each one? From "for his unwitting sin."